Depending on humidity, some technical properties of T. chebula (black halile) dried fruit were investigated. It was observed that various properties, such as dimension, geometric mean diameter, and arithmetic mean diameter, increased linearly with increasing moisture content. With the increase in moisture content, sphericity increased from 57.2% to 67.7%, surface area increased from 487.65 mm2 to 805.03 mm2, porosity increased from 0.49 to 0.59, and the angle of repose increased from 22.77° to 27.86°. However, moisture content, true density, and bulk density decreased from 1.85% to 3.27%, 1469.54 kg/m3 to 1740.22 kg/m3, and 735.64 kg/m3 to 705.99 kg/m3, respectively. When the moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, the static and dynamic friction coefficient increased from 0.231 to 0.495 and 0.311 to 0.637, respectively. The lowest static and dynamic friction force values were obtained for stainless steel and the highest for rubber surface. When moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, tensile strength decreased from 446.46 N to 257.59 N. Rupture energy and deformation increased with an increase in the moisture content of the fruit. When the moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, the rupture energy and deformation increased from 0.09 J to 0.27 J and 0.83 mm to 1.76 mm, respectively.
Key words: deformation, friction coefficients, rupture energy, rupture force, Terminalia chebula
Corresponding Author: Elçin Yeşiloğlu Cevher, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey. Email: elciny@omu.edu.tr
Received: 23 June 2022; Accepted: 17 November 2022; Published: 7 December 2022
© 2022 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
Terminalia chebula (T. chebula) belongs to the Combretaceae family. The fruit is a yellowish-green oval drupe, 3–6-cm long and 1.3–1.5-cm wide, containing an oval seed. T. chebula can grow in various soils, including clay and shady soils. The trees can be grown at altitudes of about 2000 m above sea level and in regions where the annual precipitation is 100–150 cm and the temperature is 0–17°C. Although T. chebula is a native of Asia, it is also found in Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Egypt, Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Yunnan, Tibet, and Guangdong, Guangxi province of China. In India, it grows in the deciduous forests of Himachal Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, and West Bengal (Gupta, 2012). Famous as kara halile in Turkey, worldwide T. chebula is known as myrobalan, mapki, harad, harada, karkchettu, kadukkaya, king of medicine, halile, harde, harar, and sa mao tchet. T. chebula is rich in organic acids, flavonoid substances, ascorbic acid, protein, amino acids, and minerals (Murathan et al., 2020). It is called the “king of medicines” in Tibet and ranks first as an Ayurvedic medicine for its extraordinary wound-healing power and wide range of medicinal properties. T. chebula has antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antidiabetic, antimutagenic, antioxidant, antiulcer, and wound-healing properties. It also prevents heart damage, and is used to treat kidney disease. It is a mild, safe, and effective laxative in traditional medicine. T. chebula and its photo components have therapeutic effects without toxicity. It is an active ingredient in the well-known herbal preparation triphala, which is used to treat liver enlargement, stomach ailments, and eye inflictions (Gupta, 2012). Triphala’s main component is a seed coat powder of dried T. chebula fruit. Therefore, removing the seed from the seed coat must be carried out carefully. It is necessary to design suitable equipment to perform this separation process (Pathak et al., 2020). It is essential to know the engineering properties of the material for designing and developing equipment and for processing, transportation, classification, separation, and storage of agricultural products. This includes engineering features such as shape, size, mass, bulk density, true density, porosity, coefficient of static-dynamic friction against various surfaces, and rupture characteristics of the product. The engineering information obtained could be used to determine the efficiency and operation of crop machinery (Gharibzahedi et al., 2010; Sangamithra et al., 2016).
The moisture content of the product is one of the critical parameters in the designing of suitable equipment. Moisture-related properties of agricultural products are essential for process design, determination of product quality, processing, and packaging (Rao et al., 2005). The physical properties of agricultural products are used in the designing of processing units, such as cleaning, separation, storage, transport, and drying systems. Sphericity is used to understand heat and mass transfer. The stagnation angle is an indicator of the flowing ability of a food product. Porosity is the property used to characterize and process food products (Bajpai et al., 2019). Many researchers have conducted research to determine agricultural products’ physical and mechanical properties depending on their moisture content. For example, Bajpai et al. (2019), Gharibzahedi et al. (2010), Pathak et al. (2020), and Putri et al. (2015) conducted studies to determine the physical and mechanical properties of jamun seeds, black cumin, myrobalan fruits, and rice, respectively, depending on their moisture content. Studies have been conducted using seeds and nuts to determine engineering properties of Jatropha curcas L. seeds (Herak et al., 2013), raw cashews (Balasubramanian, 2001), mahogany seeds and kernels (Aviara et al., 2014), almond seeds (Atteh et al., 2021), charoli nut (Shelare et al., 2021), bambara groundnut seed (Aremu et al., 2022), arugula seed (Mirzabe et al., 2021), tamaring seed (Mohite et al., 2019), and date nut (Ola et al., 2020). Investigation into physical and mechanical properties of agricultural products has an essential role in the designing aspects of harvesting and post-harvest machinery as well as sorting, packaging, and transport equipment (Bajpai et al., 2019).
The literature review assessed the physical properties of T chebula and discovered that engineering features are not determined by their moisture content. The study to assess the engineering properties was carried out by considering the moisture content and the mechanical properties of the product obtained under the compression load which have not been studied before. This was obtained from the mechanical properties of rupture force, rupture energy, and deformation. Mechanical effects can damage harvest or post-harvest crops. Damage to the outer layers of the product causes faster deterioration. These factors negatively affect the storability and shelf life of products.
For this reason, it is essential to know the mechanical properties of agricultural products (Yıldız and Cevher, 2022). The study was carried out with three different moisture contents, and the relationship between engineering properties was explained through mathematical equations. Physical properties of T. chebula dried fruit such as length, width, thickness, geometric-arithmetic mean diameter, sphericity, surface area, bulk density, true density, porosity, and inclination angle were investigated as engineering properties. At the same time, mechanical properties such as fracture force, fracture energy, deformation, and static and dynamic friction coefficients were determined. Thus, engineering properties for improving the quality of T. chebula dried fruit have been demonstrated.
T. chebula dried fruit used in the study was obtained from the local market in Samsun, Turkey. Before starting the experiments, all foreign material in the samples, such as dirt, stones, dust, and cracked dried fruit were cleaned manually. Then, the initial and conditioned moisture content values were determined by keeping the dried fruit in a standard hot air oven at 105°C for 24 h. In the study, the samples were conditioned by adding a calculated amount of water according to the following equation to reach different humidity levels (Balasubramanian, 2001; Pathak et al., 2019; Yurtlu et al., 2010):
where
Q: mass of water to be added (kg),
Wi: initial mass (kg),
Mi: initial moisture content of the sample in percent (% wet basis [wb]), and
Mf: final moisture content of the sample in percent (% wb).
In order to ensure a homogeneous moisture distribution, the samples were placed in polyethylene bags and kept in a refrigerator at 5°C for 1 week. Humidity control was conducted before starting the experiments. The study was conducted with kara halile dried fruit with a moisture content of 1.85%, 2.59%, and 3.27% wb (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Dried Termınalıa chebula fruit.
Randomly selected 30 samples of T. chebula dried fruit were used. Dimensions of dried fruit were measured with a digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm (Mitutoyo, Absolute Digimatic, Japan) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Size measurement of T. chebula dried fruit.
Mass measurements were conducted with a Kern electronic precision balance with a sensitivity of 0.01 g and a maximum measurement capacity of 2500 g. The arithmetic mean diameter (Da), geometric mean diameter (Dg), and sphericity (ϕ) values were calculated with the following equations (Bulan et al., 2020; Mohsenin, 1970, 1980) (Figure 3):
where L is the length (mm), W is the width (mm), T is the thickness (mm), and ϕ is the sphericity.
Figure 3. Dimensions of T. chebula dried fruit.
Following equation was used to calculate the surface area (Mohsenin, 1980):
where S: surface area (mm2) and
Dg : geometric mean diameter (mm).
The bulk density (Pb) was determined by filling T. chebula dried fruit to a height of 150 mm into a 500-mL cylindrical carton and weighing it. The true density (Pt) was obtained by displacement method using the container with known mass and volume of the samples. While applying this method, toluene (C7H8), which is less absorbed by the samples, was used instead of water (Yurtlu and Yeşiloglu, 2011).
The porosity (ε, %) was determined using bulk density and true density values (Mohsenin, 1980; Selvi et al., 2020).
where Pb: bulk density (kg m–3), and Pt: true density (kg m–3) (Mohsenin, 1980):
A 200 mm in diameter and 150 mm in height conical cylinder with two open sides was used to determine the angle of repose (Q). The conical cylinder filled with T. chebula dried fruit was lifted slowly, and its height and diameter consisting of fruit samples were measured. The angle of repose (Q, degree) is determined by the following equation (Pathak et al., 2019):
where
H: height of cone (mm) and
D: diameter of the cone (mm).
For T. chebula dried fruit, this was determined by connecting a wooden box to the load cell of the universal tester. The wooden box (60 × 120 × 100 mm) had an opening at the bottom and was connected to the load cell (Lloyd Biologicals Tester; Figure 4) with a pulley mechanism. The test was carried out by moving the box filled with dried fruit horizontally at a speed of 100 mm/min so that the contents were in contact with the friction surface.
Figure 4. Wooden box used in friction tests.
The opening at the bottom of the box allowed the fruit to touch the friction surface. A 10-mm gap was left between the opening and the surface of the fruit-filled box. Horizontal pull (friction force) was recorded with the software of the Lloyd device. The friction test was conducted at a sliding speed of 100 mm/min. Stainless steel, court fabric galvanized sheet and rubber surfaces were used in the test carried out with 10 replications (Yurtlu and Yeşiloğlu, 2011).
A universal biological material test device (Lloyd Instrument LRX Plus; Lloyd Instruments Ltd, Bognor Regis, United Kingdom) was used to determine rupture force, rupture energy, and deformation values of T. chebula dried fruit (Selvi et al., 2020; Yurtlu and Yeşiloğlu 2011). The experiments were carried out with a load cell having a capacity of 1000 Newton (N) by applying load to the cross-section axis of dried fruit at a compression speed of 10 mm/min. The coordinate system describing the compression position of dried fruit is given in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Axis of T. chebula dried fruit under compression load.
Data obtained from the compression test experiments were processed using the NEXYGEN Plus software (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Lloyd Instrument universal testing machine.
Statistical analysis of the data was performed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 21 software. T. chebula dried fruit were tested at three different moisture contents (1.85, 2.89, and 3.27% wb) for all traits. Each test was performed in triplicate and mean ± standard deviation values were obtained and examined for variance using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. In addition, linear regression analysis was performed to obtain regression equation and coefficient of determination (R2) for all parameters.
Dimensions of T. chebula dried fruit are given in Table 1. With increase in moisture content, the three axial dimensions of the fruit also increased. This could be due to expansion in fruit size with moisture filled in the cell spaces of dried fruit. As the moisture content increased from 1% to 3.27%, the length, width, and thickness of dried fruit increased from 21.34 mm to 25.70 mm, 10.57 mm to 14.16 mm, and 8.55 mm to 11.27 mm, respectively. In addition, the average diameter of the fruit increased with the moisture content. With increase in the moisture content from 1.85% to 3.27%, the arithmetic and geometric mean diameters increased from 13.49 mm to 17.05 mm and 12.41–15.99 mm, respectively.
Table 1. Means and standard deviation of the axial dimensions of dried T. chebula fruit.
| Moisture content (%) wb | Axial dimension (mm) | Average diameter (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (L) | Width (W) | Thickness (T) | Arithmetic mean (Da) | p-value | |
| 1.85 ± 2 | 21.34 ± 2.98a | 10.57 ± 0.96a | 8.55 ± 0.86a | 13.49 ± 0.41a | 0.000 |
| 2.59 ± 2 | 24.31 ± 0.53a,b | 13.38 ± 0.26b | 10.29 ± 0.54b | 15.90 ± 0.53b | 0.000 |
| 3.27 ± 2 | 25.70 ± 0.90a,b | 14.16 ± 0.96c | 11.27 ± 0.75c | 17.05 ± 0.62c | 0.000 |
Note: Different letters in superscript indicate the import differences.
T. chebula dried fruit was statistically significantly related to humidity. Therefore, depending on the moisture content, the geometric mean diameter (Dg) of T. chebula dried fruit is presented graphically in Figure 7.
Figure 7. Effect of moisture content on the geometric mean diameter of T. chebula dried fruit.
The given equation in Figure 7 establishes a relationship between the geometric mean diameter and the moisture content. The size and diameter values of T. chebula dried fruit were significantly affected by the moisture content (p ≤ 0.01).
Globality, which primarily refers to a social condition, potentially the end-point of globalization, and reveals the degree of global definition of the product, is an important parameter used in bringing products together. The sphericity of T. chebula dried fruit was significantly affected by the moisture content and increased from 57.2% to 67.7% (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 8). This indicates that relatively proportional changes occur in the size of the dried fruit because of sphericity. The linear equation for sphericity can be formulated as given in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Effect of moisture content on the sphericity of T. chebula dried fruit.
Trends similar to the effect of moisture content on the sphericity of T. chebula dried fruit were reported by Vashishth et al. (2020) for horse gram, Gharibaahedi et al. (2010) for black cumin seed, Su et al. (2021) for maize kernel, and Yurtlu et al. (2010) for laurel seed.
In the study, the moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit increased from 1.85% to 3.27% and the surface area increased from 487.65 mm2 to 805.03 mm2. Figure 9 shows the linear relationship between moisture content and surface area and the regression equation of relationship between the moisture content and the surface area of the dried fruit of T. chebula. The surface area was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) affected by the moisture content.
Figure 9. Effect of moisture content on the surface area of T. chebula dried fruit.
In the study, the bulk density of T. chebula dried fruit decreased from 735.64 kg/ m3 to 705.99 kg/m3. This showed that the product’s mass increased due to lower moisture absorption than the volumetric expansion. The relationship between moisture content and bulk density and the regression equation is shown in Figure 10. The bulk density of T. chebula dried fruit was significantly affected by the moisture content (p ≤ 0.01).
Figure 10. Effect of moisture content on the bulk density of T. chebula dried fruit.
A negative correlation was observed between the moisture content and bulk density of T. chebula dried fruit. Similar results were observed in the studies conducted by Bhushan and Raigar (2020) for rice bean, Malik and Saini (2016) for sunflower seed, and Selvi et al. (2006) for linseed.
True density of any product is a physical property that can be used in aerodynamic handling and separation processes. In case of T. chebula dried fruit, this feature refers to its true mass, excluding all its cavities and pores (Bhushan and Raigar, 2020).
The true density of T. chebula dried fruit increased from 1469.54 kg/m3 to 1740.22 kg/m3 and was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) affected by its moisture content. The relationship between moisture content and true density, and regression equation, is given in Figure 11. The overall increase in the true density of T. chebula dried fruit could be due to the higher increase in weight than fruit volume. The true density results of T. chebula dried fruit agreed with the results of the studies conducted by Singh and Meghwal (2019) for ajwain seed and Bhushan and Raigar (2020) for rice beans.
Figure 11. Effect of moisture content on the true density of T. chebula dried fruit.
Porosity is an essential feature for applying airflow to agricultural grain products, and their packaging and cooling processes. With increase in the moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit from 1.85% to 3.27%, the porosity increased from 0.49 to 0.5. The porosity value of T. chebula dried fruit was significantly (p ≤ 0.00) affected by moisture content. The relation between moisture content and porosity along with the regression equation is given in Figure 12.
Figure 12. Effect of moisture content on the porosity of T. chebula dried fruit.
The results obtained for the porosity of T. chebula dried fruit, depending on the moisture content, were consistent with the results obtained by Kumar et al. (2016) for chironji nut (Buchanania lanzan).
The angle of repose is the maximum angle at which a granular agricultural product can stand without scattering as a heap. This angle value can be used to design equipment and warehouse structure where mass flow of product is confronted. The angle of repose of T. chebula dried fruit was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) affected by its moisture content. The effect of moisture content on the angle of repose of T. chebula dried fruit and the regression equation are given in Figure 13.
Figure 13. Effect of moisture content on angle of repose of T. chebula dried fruit.
An increase in the natural agglomeration angle of T. chebula dried fruit was observed. The increased moisture of T. chebula dried fruit decreased its flow ability, which increased fruit’s stickiness. The natural agglomeration angle of T. chebula dried fruit increased from 22.77° to 27.86°. The result obtained agreed with the result of the study conducted by Bajpai et al. (2019) for jamun seed (Syzgium cuminii).
It is necessary to know the friction coefficient of an agricultural product, mainly when it is transported by a conveyor. The friction coefficient of an agricultural product varies with the used surface. The following four surfaces were used in the study to compute static and dynamic friction coefficient values: the most commonly used stainless steel, court fabric, galvanized sheet, and rubber. The static and dynamic friction coefficient results of T. chebula dried fruit are summarized in Table 2.
It was observed that static friction coefficients were higher than dynamic friction coefficients for all moisture contents. In addition, static and dynamic friction coefficient values for the tire’s surface were much higher than for other surfaces. This could be explained by the fact that the tire’s surface was rougher than other test surfaces used. A lower adhesion force between smoother stainless-steel surface and T. chebula dried fruit resulted in lower coefficients of static and dynamic friction (Shafaei and Kamgar, 2017; Visvanathan et al., 1996).
The coefficient of friction depends on roughness of the material used and frictional forces, which causes an increase in energy consumption. Similar results were obtained for the coefficient of friction in other studies (Kaliniewicz et al., 2013; Shafaei and Kamgar, 2017; Visvanathan et al., 1996).
According to the results presented in Table 2, the highest value of dynamic friction coefficient was obtained for rubber surface (0.448), followed by court fabric (0.387), galvanized sheet (0.338), and stainless steel (0.252). Similar results were obtained for static friction coefficient.
Table 2. Average static and dynamic friction coefficient values for different moisture content and surfaces used for T. chebula dried fruit.
| Moisture content | Surface | Dynamic coefficient of friction | Static coefficient of friction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.85 ± 2 | Stainless steel | 0.174 ± 0.011 | 0.249 ± 0.012 |
| Court fabric | 0.259 ± 0.005 | 0.359 ± 0.009 | |
| Galvanized sheet | 0.218 ± 0.012 | 0.261 ± 0.017 | |
| Rubber | 0.274 ± 0.021 | 0.374 ± 0.037 | |
| 2.59 ± 2 | Stainless steel | 0.220 ± 0.021 | 0.360 ± 0.044 |
| Court fabric | 0.359 ± 0.021 | 0.471 ± 0.049 | |
| Galvanized sheet | 0.344 ± 0.024 | 0.434 ± 0.035 | |
| Rubber | 0.446 ± 0.035 | 0.664 ± 0.013 | |
| 3.27 ± 2 | Stainless steel | 0.362 ± 0.028 | 0.472 ± 0.028 |
| Court fabric | 0.543 ± 0.017 | 0.650 ± 0.021 | |
| Galvanized sheet | 0.451 ± 0.023 | 0.568 ± 0.014 | |
| Rubber | 0.623 ± 0.016 | 0.858 ± 0.021 | |
| Mean values | |||
| Stainless steel | 0.252a ± 0.084 | 0.361a ± 0.098 | |
| Court fabric | 0.387c ± 0.120 | 0.481c ± 0.127 | |
| Galvanized sheet | 0.338b ± 0.099 | 0.433b ± 0.134 | |
| Rubber | 0.448d ± 0.147 | 0.632d ± 0.204 | |
| 1.85 ± 2 | 0.231a ± 0.041 | 0.311a ± 0.061 | |
| 2.59 ± 2 | 0.342b ± 0.086 | 0.482b ± 0.119 | |
| 3.27 ± 2 | 0.495c ± 0.101 | 0.637c ± 0.146 | |
| p-values | |||
| Moisture content | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Surface | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Moisture content × surface | 0.000 | 0.000 |
The increase in moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit caused an increase in both dynamic and static friction coefficients. This could be attributed to the increase in adhesion forces between the fruit and the surfaces used, because a rise in humidity increased the stickiness of dried fruit (Esgici et al., 2018; Ghodki and Goswami., 2016). The lowest value of the dynamic friction coefficient was obtained for stainless steel surface (0.361), and the highest value was for rubber surface (0.632). The same results were observed for static friction coefficient.
Table 2 also includes the results of Duncan’s multiple range tests to identify significant differences between average moisture content and the examined surfaces. Significant differences were observed between static and dynamic friction coefficients and moisture content. One-way ANOVA demonstrated that variations in moisture content, surfaces used, and interaction between moisture content and surface were significant for both static and dynamic friction coefficients (p ≤ 0.01). Both static and dynamic friction coefficients for T. chebula dried fruit increased linearly with moisture content and varied with used structural surfaces. This trend was consistent with the findings of the previous studies (Aviara et al., 2014, 2015; Shafaei et al., 2016).
At higher moisture content, increased roughness was observed in T. chebula dried fruit, resulting in its decreased sliding properties and increased coefficient of static friction. In addition, an increase in static friction coefficient was observed due to increased stickiness and adhesion forces between T. chebula dried fruit and material surfaces used at higher moisture content.
T. chebula dried fruit with moisture contents of 1.85%, 2.59%, and 3.27% was tested in the cross-section direction. The mechanical properties of T. chebula dried fruit, such as rupture force, rupture energy, and deformation values, were determined. It was observed that moisture content had a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) effect on the mechanical properties of the fruit.
The study determined that the force required for rupturing T. chebula dried fruit decreased with increasing moisture content. This was due to increased flexibility of the dry fruit because of increased moisture content; increase in elasticity decreased the rupture force of the fruit. It was concluded that rupture force was minimum when moisture content was maximum. This established that more loading force was required when the moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit was low and vice versa.
In T. chebula dried fruit, for a moisture content of 1.85%, the minimum rupture force determined was 405.24 N and the maximum was 487.20 N. For a moisture content of 2.59%, the minimum rupture force was 296.79 N and the maximum was 397.72 N. Finally, for a moisture content of 3.27%, the minimum rupture force determined was 214.29 N and the maximum was 309.33 N. One-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant relation between moisture content and rupture force of T. chebula dried fruit (p ≤ 0.01); this along with regression equation is given in Figure 14.
Figure 14. Effect of moisture content on the rupture force of T. chebula dried fruit.
The results obtained in the present study were compatible with the previous studies (Amoah et al., 2017; Pathak et al., 2020; Putri et al., 2015).
Depending on the size of the fruit or seed, increase in rupture energy was observed in T. chebula dried fruit (Pathak et al., 2020). Increase in size of the fruit or seed increased its rupture energy. At a moisture content of 1.85%, the maximum rupture energy determined was 0.11 J and the minimum was 0.07 J. At a moisture content of 2.59%, the maximum rupture energy determined was 0.18 J and the minimum was 0.13 J. Finally, at a moisture content of 3.27%, the maximum rupture energy was 0.31 J and the minimum was 0.22 J. The relationship between moisture content and rupture energy was significant (p ≤ 0.01), which along with the regression equation is given in Figure 15.
Figure 15. Effect of moisture content on the rupture energy of T. chebula dried fruit.
The results obtained for rupture energy in the present study were compatible with the previous studies (Olaniyan and Oje, 2002; Shashikumar et al., 2018; Swain and Gupta, 2013).
Deformation in T. chebula dried fruit also increased with the moisture content. At a moisture content of 1.85%, the maximum deformation determined was 0.94 mm whereas the minimum was 0.73 mm. At a moisture content of 2.59%, the maximum deformation determined was 1.64 mm whereas the minimum was minimum 1.22 mm. Finally, at a moisture content of 3.27%, the maximum deformation determined was 1.61 mm whereas the minimum was 0.65 J. According to one-way ANOVA, the effect of moisture content on the deformation of T. chebula dried fruit was significant (p ≤ 0.01). The relationship between moisture content and deformation, along with the regression equation, is given in Figure 16.
Figure 16. Effect of moisture content on the deformation of T. chebula dried fruit.
It was observed that deformation and rupture energy increased whereas rupture force decreased with increased moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit. Similar results were obtained for faba bean (Altuntaş and Yıldız, 2007), beechwood seed (Nyorere and Uguru, 2018), walnut (Sharifian and Derafshi, 2008), and Lima bean (Aghkhani et al., 2012). Further, if the moisture content of T. chebula dried fruit was low, it was less susceptible to breakage during harvest and post-harvest processing.
The effect of moisture content on the crushing resistance of T. chebula dried fruit was also investigated in the present study. The results depicted that the crushing resistance of the dried fruit was a function of fruit’s moisture content, because breaking force of the seed decreased whereas its breaking energy and deformation increased with increase in the moisture content of the fruit. Therefore, the crushing resistance of the fruit was found to be useful for designing and development of processing machinery.
The study obtained the following results, including the physical and mechanical properties of T. chebula dried fruit at a moisture content of 1.85%, 2.59%, and 3.27% wb. The moisture content significantly affected dried fruit’s physical and mechanical properties (p ≤ 0.01).
Physical properties of T. chebula dried fruit increased with increasing moisture content, except for bulk density.
Maximum static and dynamic friction coefficient values were observed for the rubber surface, followed by court fabric, galvanized sheet, and stainless steel.
Rupture force decreased with an increase in the moisture content of the fruit.
Deformation and rupture energy increased with an increase in the moisture content of the fruit.
The results and regression equations of physical and mechanical properties of T. chebula fruit obtained in the study, depending on the moisture content, would provide technical and functional information for designing harvest and post-harvest machinery and classification, separation, packaging, and transportation of the product.
Aghkhani M.H., Miraei Ashtiani S.H., Baradaran Motie J. and Abbaspour-Fart M.H. 2012. Physical properties of Christmas Lima bean at different moisture content. Int Agrophy. 26(4): 341–316. 10.2478/v10247-012-0048-0
Altuntaş E. and Yıldız M. 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. J Food Eng. 78(1): 174–183. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.013
Amoah R., Abano E.E., and Anyidoho E.K. 2017. The effects of moisture content and loading orientation on some physical and mechanical properties of “tafo hybrid” and “amelonado” cocoa beans. J Food Process Eng. 40(1): e12348. 10.1111/jfpe.12348
Aremu A.K., Ojo-Ariyo A.M. and Oyefeso B.O. 2022. Physical characterisation of two varieties of bambara groundnut seeds. Adeleke Univ J Eng Technol. 5(1): 31–38.
Atteh B., Olukemi O. and Adelola O.B. 2021. The effects of moisture content variation on some engineering properties of almond seed (Terminalia catappa). Indonesian Food Sci Technol J. 4(2): 45–50.
Aviara N.A., Lawal A.A., Mshelia H.M. and Musa D. 2014. Effect of moisture content on some engineering properties of mahogany (Khaya senegalensis) seed and kernel. Res Agric Eng. 60(1): 30–36. 10.17221/10/2012-RAE
Aviara N.A., Onaji M.E. and Lawal A.A. 2015. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Detarium microcarpum seed. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 17(4): 311–326.
Bajpai A., Kumar Y., Singh H., Prabhakar P.K. and Meghwal M. 2019. Effect of moisture content on the engineering properties of jamun (Syzgium cuminii) seed. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13325. 10.1111/jfpe.13325
Balasubramanian D. 2001. Physical properties of raw cashew nut. J Agric Eng Res. 78: 291–297. 10.1006/jaer.2000.0603
Bhushan B. and Raigar R.K. 2020. Influence of moisture content on engineering properties of two varieties of rice bean. J Food Process Eng. 43(10): e13507. 10.1111/jfpe.13507
Bulan R., Ayu E.S. and Sitorus A. 2020. Effects of moisture content on some engineering properties of areca nut (Areca Catechu L.) fruit are relevant to the design of processing equipment. INMATEH. Agric Eng. 60(1): 61–70. 10.35633/inmateh-60-07
Esgici R., Pekitkan F.G., Güzel E. and Sessiz A. 2018. Friction coefficients for gundelia tournefortii seed on various surfaces. In: XIX World Congress of CIGR (Commission Internationale du Génie Rural) on Sustainable life for children, Vol. 22. p. 25.
Gharibzahedi S.M.T., Mousavi S.M., Moayedi A., Garavand A.T. and Alizadeh S.M. 2010. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 12(1).
Ghodki B.M. and Goswami T.K. 2016. Effect of moisture on physical and mechanical properties of cassia. Cogent Food Agric. 2(1): 1192975. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1192975
Gupta P.C. 2012. Biological and pharmacological properties of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Haritaki)—an overview. Int J Pharm Sci. 4(3): 62–68.
Herak D., Kabutey A., Divisova M. and Simanjuntak S. 2013. Mathematical model of mechanical behavior of Jatropha curcas L. seeds under compression loading. Biosyst Eng. 114(3): 279–288. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.12.007
Kaliniewicz Z.D., Tylek P., Markowski P., Anders A., Rawa T., Jóźwiak K. and Fura S.Ù. 2013. Correlations between the germination capacity and selected physical properties of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seeds. Baltic For. 19(2): 201–211.
Kumar J., Prabhakar P.K., Srivastav P.P. and Bhowmick P.K. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Chironji (Buchanania Lanzan) nut. J Agric Eng. 53(2): 45–54.
Malik M.A. and Saini C.S. 2016. Engineering properties of sunflower seed: effect of dehulling and moisture content. Cogent Food Agric. Article: 1145783. 2(1): 2–30. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1145783
Mirzabe A.H., Hajiahmad A. and Asadollahzadeh A.H. 2021. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of arugula seed relevant in mechanical processing and bulk handling. J Food Process Eng. 44(6): e13704. 10.1111/jfpe.13704
Mohite A.M., Sharma N. and Mishra A. 2019. Influence of different moisture content on engineering properties of tamarind seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 21(1): 220–224.
Mohsenin N.N. 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Vol. 1: Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. Gordon and Breach Science, New York, NY.
Murathan Z.T., Erbil N. and Arslan M. 2020. Tıbbi amaçli kullanilan terminalia chebula ve terminalia citrina Bitkilerinin Kurutulmuş Meyvelerinde Antiradikal, Antibakteriyel ve mutajenik aktivite analizleri. Adnan Menderes Üniv Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 17(2): 181–187. 10.25308/aduziraat.691867
Nyorere O. and Uguru H. 2018. Effect of loading rate and moisture content on the fracture resistance of beechwood (Gmelina Arborea) seed. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 22(10): 1609–1613. 10.4314/jasem.v22i10.14
Ola O.I., Amoniyan O.A. and Opaleye S.O. 2020. Evaluation and quality assessment of pancakes produced from wheat (Triticum aestivum) and germinated tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) composite flour. Eur J Nutr Food Safety, 12(5): 82–89. 10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i530230
Olaniyan AK. and Oje P.H. 2022. Post-harvest technology: some aspects of the mechanical properties of the shea nut. Biosyst. Eng. 81(4): 413–420. 10.1006/bioe.2002.0049
Pathak S.S., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2019. Mass modeling of Belleric Myrobalan and its physical characterization in relation to post-harvest processing and machine designing. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1290–1300. 10.1007/s13197-019-04162-1
Pathak S.S., Sonawane A., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2020. Effect of moisture and axes orientation on the mechanical properties of the Myrobalan fruits and its seed under compressive loading. J Inst Eng India A. 101(4): 679–688. 10.1007/s40030-020-00476-y
Putri R.E., Yahya A., Adam N.M. and Abd Azis S. 2015. Correlation of moisture content to selected mechanical properties of rice grain sample. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol. 5(5): 264–267. 10.18517/ijaseit.5.5.561
Rao M.A., Syed S.H. and Rizvi Datta A.K. 2005. Engineering Properties of Foods, Vol. 1, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–15.
Sangamithra A., Gabriela J.S., Prema R.S., Nandini K., Kannan K., Sasikala S. and Suganya P. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of maize kernels. Int Food Res J. 23(1): 109.
Selvi K.Ç., Pınar Y. and Yeşiloğlu E. 2006. Some physical properties of linseed. Biosyst Eng. 95(4): 607–612. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.008
Selvi K.C., Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. and Sauk H. 2020. Engıneerıng propertıes of two hazelnuts varieties and its kernel relation to harvest and threshing. Ital J Food Sci. 32(3): 528-539.
Shafaei S.M. and Kamgar S. 2017. A comprehensive investigation on static and dynamic friction coefficients of wheat grain with the adoption of statistical analysis. J Adv Res. 8(4): 351–361. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.04.003
Shafaei S.M., Nourmohamadi-Moghadami A. and Kamgar S. 2016. Analytical study of friction coefficients of pomegranate seed as essential parameters in the design of post-harvest equipment. Inform Process Agric. 3(3): 133–145. 10.1016/j.inpa.2016.05.003
Sharifian F. and Derafshi M.H. 2008. Mechanical behavior of walnut under cracking conditions. J Appl Sci. 8(5): 886–890. 10.3923/jas.2008.886.890
Shashikumar C., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2018. Influence of moisture content and compression axis on physico-mechanical properties of Shorea robusta seeds. J Inst Eng India A. 99(2): 279–286. 10.1007/s40030-018-0274-y
Shelare S., Kumar R. and Khope P. 2021. Assessment of physical, frictional, and aerodynamic properties of charoli (buchanania lanzan spreng) nut as potentials for development of processing machines. Carpathian J Food Sci Technol. 13(2): 174–191.
Singh H. and Meghwal M. 2019. Physical and thermal properties of various ajwain (Trachyspermum Ammi L.) seed varieties as a function of moisture content. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13310. 10.1111/jfpe.13310
Su Y., Cui T, Xia G, Gao X., Li Y, Qiao M. and Xu Y. 2021. Effects of different moisture content and varieties on physico-mechanical properties of maize kernel and pedicel. J Food Process Eng. 44(9): e13778. 10.1111/jfpe.13778
Swain S. and Gupta J. 2013. Moisture-related mechanical properties of drum-roasted cashew nut under compression loading. J. Crop Weed. 9(1): 164–167.
Vashishth R., Semwal A.D., Pal Murugan M., Govind Raj T. and Sharma G.K. 2020. Engineering properties of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) varieties as a function of moisture content and structure of grain. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1477–1485. 10.1007/s13197-019-04183-w
Visvanathan R., Palanisamy P.T, Gothandapani L. and Sreenarayanan V. V. 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. J Agric Eng Res. 63(1): 19–25. 10.1006/jaer.1996.0003
Yıldız T. and Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. 2022. Some mechanical properties of chestnut in relation to product processing and equipment design. Turkish J Agric Food Sci Technol. 10(8): 1565–1570. 10.24925/turjaf.v10i8.1565-1570.5332
Yurtlu Y.B. and Yeşiloglu E. 2011. Mechanical behavior and split resistance of chestnut under compressive loading. J Agric Sci. 17(4): 337–346. 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001185
Yurtlu Y.B., Yeşiloglu E. and Arslanoglu F. 2010. Physical properties of bay laurel seeds. Int. Agrophys. 24: 325–328.