Chinese consumers’ attribute preference prediction for table grapes

Main Article Content

Tianqi Liu
Junwei Wang
Yumeng Feng
Weisong Mu

Keywords

binary logistic regression, consumers’ preferences, intrinsic attribute, prediction models, table grapes

Abstract

This paper aims to understand intrinsic attribute preferences of Chinese consumers for table grapes, analyze the influencing factors, and build consumer preference prediction models. In this study, 4324 consumers from various regions of China were investigated. We analyzed consumer preferences and the influencing factors. Finally, binary logistic regression was used to construct prediction models of consumers’ intrinsic attribute preferences for table grapes. The results showed that grapes popular with Chinese consumers had fixed characteristics, including moderate size, spherical or near-spherical shape, purple-red color, strawberry flavor, light aroma, soft flesh and juicy, sweet taste, seedlessness, thin skin powder, and easy to peel. The results of the prediction models showed that age, annual consumption of grapes, and other factors of consumers had significant effects on consumer preferences. The prediction models achieved 80% accuracy in predicting consumer preferences for taste, seedless and peeling degrees. Analyzing the latest attribute preferences of Chinese table grapes, consumers can provide on the one hand, breeding direction reference for breeders, and on the other, marketing suggestions for marketers in the table grape industry. This study comprehensively investigated the intrinsic attribute preferences of Chinese table grape consumers, mastered the latest results of consumer preferences, added the indicators of the intrinsic attributes from the perspective of consumer demand, and conducted relatively more complete prediction research on the preferences of Chinese consumers.

Abstract 1218 | PDF Downloads 612 HTML Downloads 0 XML Downloads 71

References

Akkurt M., Tahmaz H. and Lu S.V. 2019. Recent developments in seedless grapevine breeding. South Afr J Enol Vitic (SAJEV). 40(2): 1–1.

Allison P.D. 2012. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application: SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

Carmen Del D., Esguerra E. and Gerance A. 2020. Consumer purchasing behavior for fresh soursoup (Annona muricata L.): evidence from Metro Manila and Calabarzon, Philippines. Philip Agric Sci. 103(2): 132–139.

Chu X., Li Y., Xie Y., Tian D. and Mu W. 2020. Regional difference analyzing and prediction model building for Chinese wine consumers’ sensory preference. Br Food J. 122(9): 2587–2602. 10.1108/BFJ-06-2019-0465

Cronin J.J Jr., Brady M.K. and Hult G.T.M. 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J Retail. 76(2): 193–218. 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2

Cui H.-J., Yao F., Zhao T.-Y., Budisantoso T., Huang E.-S. and Yang X. 2022. Confucian value’s influences on Chinese customer relationships in product crisis recovery. Eur J Int Manag. 17(2–3): 324–348. 10.1504/EJIM.2022.120704

Fan X., Blankenship S.M. and Mattheis J.P. 1999. 1-Methylcyclopropene inhibits apple ripening. J Am Soc Horticul Sci. 124(6): 690–695. 10.21273/JASHS.124.6.690

Feng T., Keller L.R. and Zheng X. 2011. Decision-making in the newsvendor problem: a cross-national laboratory study. Omega. 39(1): 41–50. 10.1016/j.omega.2010.02.003

Jiang J., Fan X., Zhang Y., Sun H., Li M. and Liu C. 2018. Achievements and sustainable development suggestions of grape breeding in China. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine. 01: 60–67.

Kleih A.-K. and Sparke K. 2021. Visual marketing: the importance and consumer recognition of fruit brands in supermarket fruit displays. Food Qual Pref. 93: 104263. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104263

Lohitnavy N., Bastian S. and Collins C. 2010. Berry sensory attributes correlate with compositional changes under different viticultural management of Semillon (Vitis vinifera L.). Food Qual Pref. 21(7): 711–719. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.015

Ma Z, Chen W., Kuang Y., Zheng Y., Lu K., Zou G., Zeng D. and Liu L. 2023. Association between dietary knowledge and food preferences in residents aged 18 and over in China based on latent class analysis. Acta Acad Med Sinicae. 45(05): 730–736.

Marques J.M.R., Torres A.P., Behe B.K., Langenhoven P. and Boas L.H.D.B. 2021. Exploring consumers’ preferred purchase location for fresh fruits. Hort Technol. 31(5): 595–606. 10.21273/HORTTECH04865-21

Massaglia S., Merlino V.M., Brun F., Sparacino A., Blanc S. and Borra D. 2023. What do chocolate consumers want? Exploring individual preferences and profiles, considering lifestyle, food habits and socio-demographic features. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 32: 100746. 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100746

Mu W., Feng Y., Shu H., Wang B. and Tian D. 2022. Wine recommendation algorithm based on partitioning and stacking integration strategy for Chinese wine consumers. Ital J Food Sci. 34(2): 98–109. 10.15586/ijfs.v34i2.2209

Mu W., Feng J., Tian D. and Mou X. 2019. The international trade and domestic demand of the table grape industry in China. China Fruits. 2019(02): 5–10.

Mu W., Li C., Tian D. and Feng J. 2016. Chinese consumers’ behavior and preference to table grapes: based on a comparative study of 2009 and 2014. Br Food J. 118(1): 231–246. 10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0211

National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). 2021. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing, China: China Statistical Publishing House.

Okpiaifo G., Durand-Morat A., West G.H., Nalley L.L., Nayga R.M. and Wailes E.J. 2020. Consumers’ preferences for sustainable rice practices in Nigeria. Glob Food Sec. 24: 100345. 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100345

Park J., Hyun H. and Thavisay T. 2021. A study of antecedents and outcomes of social media WOM towards luxury brand purchase intention. J Retail Consum Serv. 58: 102272. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102272

Piazzolla F., Pati S., Amodio M.L. and Colelli G. 2016. Effect of harvest time on table grape quality during on vine storage. J Sci Food Agric. 96(1): 131–139. 10.1002/jsfa.7072

Poudel P., Atreya P.N. and Dahal K.C. 2022. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) on yield and fruit quality of table grape var. Himrod in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J Agric Environ. 23: 131–142. 10.3126/aej.v23i1.46922

Predieri S., Gatti E., Cianciabella M., Daniele G.M., Magli M., Kusch C., Contador L. and Infante R. 2021. Exploring through CATA (check-all-that-apply) method the Italian consumers’ perception towards off-season nectarine imported from Chile. Eur J Hort Sci. 86(2): 169–178. 10.17660/eJHS.2021/86.2.7

Pucci T., Casprini E., Nosi C. and Zanni L. 2019. Does social media usage affect online purchasing intention for wine? The moderating role of subjective and objective knowledge. Br Food J. 121(2): 275-288. 10.1108/BFJ-06-2018-0400

Qian T., Fan H., Yang J., Zheng X. and Zhao J. 2018. Investigation and forecast of fruit consumption characteristics of Shanghai’s residents. Agric Outlook. 14(11): 122–126.

Romadhon J., Yazid M., Mulyana A. and Yunita. 2021. Social demographic factors influencing consumer’s preferences on rice attributes in Indonesia: a multinomial logistic approach. Potravinarstvo. 15: 235–244.

Saeed T.U., Burris M.W., Labi S. and Sinha K.C. 2020. An empirical discourse on forecasting the use of autonomous vehicles using consumers’ preferences. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 158: 120130. 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120130

Siegrist M., Hartmann C. and Keller C. 2013. Antecedents of food neophobia and its association with eating behavior and food choices. Food Quality Pref. 30(2): 293–298. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.013

Si-Hong K., Joon-Ho K., Young-Sik P. and Jae-Yun H. 2020. In vitro embryo rescue for the production of hypotetraploids after cross between hypotetraploid and tetraploid grape cultivars. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 48(1): 503–508. 10.15835/nbha48111795

Szczesniak A.S. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual Pref. 13(4): 215–225. 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00039-8

Tavakol M. and Dennick R. 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Edu. 2: 53. 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Taylor J.C., Sutter C., Ontai L.L., Nishina A. and Zidenberg-Cherr S. 2019. Comparisons of school and home-packed lunches for fruit and vegetable dietary behaviours among school-aged youths. Public Health Nutr. 22(10): 1850–1857. 10.1017/S136898001900017X

Uribe R., Infante R., Kusch C., Contador L., Pacheco I. and Mesa K. 2020. Do consumers evaluate new and existing fruit varieties in the same way? Modeling the role of search and experience intrinsic attributes. J Food Prod Mark. 26(8): 521–534. 10.1080/10454446.2020.1821419

Verbeke W. 2015. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual Pref. 39: 147–155. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008

Wang C, Chen F., Yi F. and Wei Y. 2021a. Critical conditions identification for online purchase intention of fruits: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Front Psychol.: 5401. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713295

Yao W., Yu H. and Sun H. 2020. Investigation and analysis on consumption characteristics and demand preference of grape market in Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu Agric Sci. 48(21): 320–328.

Yin Y., Bi B., Chen S., Li Y., Wang Y., Ge Y., Ding B., Li Y. and Zhang Z. 2011. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of cuticular wax isolated from Asian pear fruit (cv. Pingguoli). Sci Hortic. 129(4): 577–582. 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.028

Zamzami L., Andrini A. and Budiyati E. 2020. Consumer preferences for a new variety of grapes (Vitis vinifera) Paras 61. Ann Biol. 36(2): 159–162.

Zhou J., Cao L., Chen S., Perl A. and Ma H. 2015. Consumer-assisted selection: the preference for new tablegrape cultivars in China. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 21(3): 351–360. 10.1111/ajgw.12156

Zhou Q., Xia R. and Zhang C. 2016. Online shopping behavior study based on multi-granularity opinion mining: China versus America. Cognit Comput. 8(4): 587–602. 10.1007/s12559-016-9384-x