Some technical properties of dried Terminalia chebula (kara halile) for use in harvest and post-harvest processing

Main Article Content

Elçin Yeşiloğlu Cevher

Keywords

deformation, friction coefficients, rupture energy, rupture force, Terminalia chebula

Abstract

Depending on humidity, some technical properties of T. chebula (black halile) dried fruit were investigated. It was observed that various properties, such as dimension, geometric mean diameter, and arithmetic mean diameter, increased linearly with increasing moisture content. With the increase in moisture content, sphericity increased from 57.2% to 67.7%, surface area increased from 487.65 mm2 to 805.03 mm2, porosity increased from 0.49 to 0.59, and the angle of repose increased from 22.77° to 27.86°. However, moisture content, true density, and bulk density decreased from 1.85% to 3.27%, 1469.54 kg/m3 to 1740.22 kg/m3, and 735.64 kg/m3 to 705.99 kg/m3, respectively. When the moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, the static and dynamic friction coefficient increased from 0.231 to 0.495 and 0.311 to 0.637, respectively. The lowest static and dynamic friction force values were obtained for stainless steel and the highest for rubber surface. When moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, tensile strength decreased from 446.46 N to 257.59 N. Rupture energy and deformation increased with an increase in the moisture content of the fruit. When the moisture content increased from 1.85% to 3.27%, the rupture energy and deformation increased from 0.09 J to 0.27 J and 0.83 mm to 1.76 mm, respectively.

Abstract 1086 | PDF Downloads 676 HTML Downloads 180 XML Downloads 74

References

Aghkhani M.H., Miraei Ashtiani S.H., Baradaran Motie J. and Abbaspour-Fart M.H. 2012. Physical properties of Christmas Lima bean at different moisture content. Int Agrophy. 26(4): 341–316. 10.2478/v10247-012-0048-0

Altuntaş E. and Yıldız M. 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. J Food Eng. 78(1): 174–183. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.013

Amoah R., Abano E.E., and Anyidoho E.K. 2017. The effects of moisture content and loading orientation on some physical and mechanical properties of “tafo hybrid” and “amelonado” cocoa beans. J Food Process Eng. 40(1): e12348. 10.1111/jfpe.12348

Aremu A.K., Ojo-Ariyo A.M. and Oyefeso B.O. 2022. Physical characterisation of two varieties of bambara groundnut seeds. Adeleke Univ J Eng Technol. 5(1): 31–38.

Atteh B., Olukemi O. and Adelola O.B. 2021. The effects of moisture content variation on some engineering properties of almond seed (Terminalia catappa). Indonesian Food Sci Technol J. 4(2): 45–50.

Aviara N.A., Lawal A.A., Mshelia H.M. and Musa D. 2014. Effect of moisture content on some engineering properties of mahogany (Khaya senegalensis) seed and kernel. Res Agric Eng. 60(1): 30–36. 10.17221/10/2012-RAE

Aviara N.A., Onaji M.E. and Lawal A.A. 2015. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Detarium microcarpum seed. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 17(4): 311–326.

Bajpai A., Kumar Y., Singh H., Prabhakar P.K. and Meghwal M. 2019. Effect of moisture content on the engineering properties of jamun (Syzgium cuminii) seed. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13325. 10.1111/jfpe.13325

Balasubramanian D. 2001. Physical properties of raw cashew nut. J Agric Eng Res. 78: 291–297. 10.1006/jaer.2000.0603

Bhushan B. and Raigar R.K. 2020. Influence of moisture content on engineering properties of two varieties of rice bean. J Food Process Eng. 43(10): e13507. 10.1111/jfpe.13507

Bulan R., Ayu E.S. and Sitorus A. 2020. Effects of moisture content on some engineering properties of areca nut (Areca Catechu L.) fruit are relevant to the design of processing equipment. INMATEH. Agric Eng. 60(1): 61–70. 10.35633/inmateh-60-07

Esgici R., Pekitkan F.G., Güzel E. and Sessiz A. 2018. Friction coefficients for gundelia tournefortii seed on various surfaces. In: XIX World Congress of CIGR (Commission Internationale du Génie Rural) on Sustainable life for children, Vol. 22. p. 25.

Gharibzahedi S.M.T., Mousavi S.M., Moayedi A., Garavand A.T. and Alizadeh S.M. 2010. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 12(1).

Ghodki B.M. and Goswami T.K. 2016. Effect of moisture on physical and mechanical properties of cassia. Cogent Food Agric. 2(1): 1192975. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1192975

Gupta P.C. 2012. Biological and pharmacological properties of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Haritaki)—an overview. Int J Pharm Sci. 4(3): 62–68.

Herak D., Kabutey A., Divisova M. and Simanjuntak S. 2013. Mathematical model of mechanical behavior of Jatropha curcas L. seeds under compression loading. Biosyst Eng. 114(3): 279–288. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.12.007

Kaliniewicz Z.D., Tylek P., Markowski P., Anders A., Rawa T., Jóźwiak K. and Fura S.Ù. 2013. Correlations between the germination capacity and selected physical properties of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seeds. Baltic For. 19(2): 201–211.

Kumar J., Prabhakar P.K., Srivastav P.P. and Bhowmick P.K. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Chironji (Buchanania Lanzan) nut. J Agric Eng. 53(2): 45–54.

Malik M.A. and Saini C.S. 2016. Engineering properties of sunflower seed: effect of dehulling and moisture content. Cogent Food Agric. Article: 1145783. 2(1): 2–30. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1145783

Mirzabe A.H., Hajiahmad A. and Asadollahzadeh A.H. 2021. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of arugula seed relevant in mechanical processing and bulk handling. J Food Process Eng. 44(6): e13704. 10.1111/jfpe.13704

Mohite A.M., Sharma N. and Mishra A. 2019. Influence of different moisture content on engineering properties of tamarind seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 21(1): 220–224.

Mohsenin N.N. 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Vol. 1: Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. Gordon and Breach Science, New York, NY.

Murathan Z.T., Erbil N. and Arslan M. 2020. Tıbbi amaçli kullanilan terminalia chebula ve terminalia citrina Bitkilerinin Kurutulmuş Meyvelerinde Antiradikal, Antibakteriyel ve mutajenik aktivite analizleri. Adnan Menderes Üniv Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 17(2): 181–187. 10.25308/aduziraat.691867

Nyorere O. and Uguru H. 2018. Effect of loading rate and moisture content on the fracture resistance of beechwood (Gmelina Arborea) seed. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 22(10): 1609–1613. 10.4314/jasem.v22i10.14

Ola O.I., Amoniyan O.A. and Opaleye S.O. 2020. Evaluation and quality assessment of pancakes produced from wheat (Triticum aestivum) and germinated tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) composite flour. Eur J Nutr Food Safety, 12(5): 82–89. 10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i530230

Olaniyan AK. and Oje P.H. 2022. Post-harvest technology: some aspects of the mechanical properties of the shea nut. Biosyst. Eng. 81(4): 413–420. 10.1006/bioe.2002.0049

Pathak S.S., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2019. Mass modeling of Belleric Myrobalan and its physical characterization in relation to post-harvest processing and machine designing. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1290–1300. 10.1007/s13197-019-04162-1

Pathak S.S., Sonawane A., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2020. Effect of moisture and axes orientation on the mechanical properties of the Myrobalan fruits and its seed under compressive loading. J Inst Eng India A. 101(4): 679–688. 10.1007/s40030-020-00476-y

Putri R.E., Yahya A., Adam N.M. and Abd Azis S. 2015. Correlation of moisture content to selected mechanical properties of rice grain sample. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol. 5(5): 264–267. 10.18517/ijaseit.5.5.561

Rao M.A., Syed S.H. and Rizvi Datta A.K. 2005. Engineering Properties of Foods, Vol. 1, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–15.

Sangamithra A., Gabriela J.S., Prema R.S., Nandini K., Kannan K., Sasikala S. and Suganya P. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of maize kernels. Int Food Res J. 23(1): 109.

Selvi K.Ç., Pınar Y. and Yeşiloğlu E. 2006. Some physical properties of linseed. Biosyst Eng. 95(4): 607–612. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.008

Selvi K.C., Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. and Sauk H. 2020. Engıneerıng propertıes of two hazelnuts varieties and its kernel relation to harvest and threshing. Ital J Food Sci. 32(3): 528-539.

Shafaei S.M. and Kamgar S. 2017. A comprehensive investigation on static and dynamic friction coefficients of wheat grain with the adoption of statistical analysis. J Adv Res. 8(4): 351–361. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.04.003

Shafaei S.M., Nourmohamadi-Moghadami A. and Kamgar S. 2016. Analytical study of friction coefficients of pomegranate seed as essential parameters in the design of post-harvest equipment. Inform Process Agric. 3(3): 133–145. 10.1016/j.inpa.2016.05.003

Sharifian F. and Derafshi M.H. 2008. Mechanical behavior of walnut under cracking conditions. J Appl Sci. 8(5): 886–890. 10.3923/jas.2008.886.890

Shashikumar C., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2018. Influence of moisture content and compression axis on physico-mechanical properties of Shorea robusta seeds. J Inst Eng India A. 99(2): 279–286. 10.1007/s40030-018-0274-y

Shelare S., Kumar R. and Khope P. 2021. Assessment of physical, frictional, and aerodynamic properties of charoli (buchanania lanzan spreng) nut as potentials for development of processing machines. Carpathian J Food Sci Technol. 13(2): 174–191.

Singh H. and Meghwal M. 2019. Physical and thermal properties of various ajwain (Trachyspermum Ammi L.) seed varieties as a function of moisture content. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13310. 10.1111/jfpe.13310

Su Y., Cui T, Xia G, Gao X., Li Y, Qiao M. and Xu Y. 2021. Effects of different moisture content and varieties on physico-mechanical properties of maize kernel and pedicel. J Food Process Eng. 44(9): e13778. 10.1111/jfpe.13778

Swain S. and Gupta J. 2013. Moisture-related mechanical properties of drum-roasted cashew nut under compression loading. J. Crop Weed. 9(1): 164–167.

Vashishth R., Semwal A.D., Pal Murugan M., Govind Raj T. and Sharma G.K. 2020. Engineering properties of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) varieties as a function of moisture content and structure of grain. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1477–1485. 10.1007/s13197-019-04183-w

Visvanathan R., Palanisamy P.T, Gothandapani L. and Sreenarayanan V. V. 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. J Agric Eng Res. 63(1): 19–25. 10.1006/jaer.1996.0003

Yıldız T. and Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. 2022. Some mechanical properties of chestnut in relation to product processing and equipment design. Turkish J Agric Food Sci Technol. 10(8): 1565–1570. 10.24925/turjaf.v10i8.1565-1570.5332

Yurtlu Y.B. and Yeşiloglu E. 2011. Mechanical behavior and split resistance of chestnut under compressive loading. J Agric Sci. 17(4): 337–346. 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001185

Yurtlu Y.B., Yeşiloglu E. and Arslanoglu F. 2010. Physical properties of bay laurel seeds. Int. Agrophys. 24: 325–328.