Some technical properties of dried Terminalia chebula (kara halile) for use in harvest and post-harvest processing

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Elçin Yeşiloğlu Cevher

Keywords

Abstract

Sono state studiate alcune proprietà tecniche della frutta secca di T. chebula (Black Halile) in funzione dell'umidità. È stato notato che varie proprietà come la dimensione, il diametro medio geometrico e l'aritmetico aumenta linearmente con l'aumentare del contenuto di umidità. Con l'aumento del contenuto di umidità, la sfericità è aumentata dal 57,2% al 67,7%, la superficie è aumentata da 487,65 mm2 a 805,03 mm2, la porosità è aumentata da 0,49 a 0, 59 e l'angolo di riposo è aumentato da 22,77° a 27,86°. Il contenuto di umidità dall'1,85% al ​​3,27%, la densità reale da 1469,54 kg/m3 a 1740,22 kg/m3, la densità apparente da 735,64 kg/m3 a 705,99 kg/m3 è scesa a. Quando il contenuto di umidità è aumentato dall'1,85% al ​​3,27%, il coefficiente di attrito statico è aumentato da 0,231 a 0,495 e il coefficiente di attrito dinamico è aumentato da 0,311 a 0,637. Il valore più basso della forza di attrito statico e dinamico è stato ottenuto nell'acciaio e il più alto nella superficie in gomma. Il contenuto di umidità è aumentato dall'1,85% al ​​3,27%, mentre la resistenza alla trazione è diminuita da 446,46 N a 257,59 N. Con l'aumento del contenuto di umidità, l'energia di rottura e la deformazione sono aumentate. Quando il contenuto di umidità è aumentato dall'1,85% al ​​3,27%, l'energia di rottura è aumentato da 0,09 J a 0,27 J e la deformazione è aumentato rispettivamente da 0,83 mm a 1,76 mm.

Abstract 1086 | PDF (Inglese) Downloads 676 HTML (Inglese) Downloads 180 XML (Inglese) Downloads 74

Riferimenti bibliografici

Aghkhani M.H., Miraei Ashtiani S.H., Baradaran Motie J. and Abbaspour-Fart M.H. 2012. Physical properties of Christmas Lima bean at different moisture content. Int Agrophy. 26(4): 341–316. 10.2478/v10247-012-0048-0

Altuntaş E. and Yıldız M. 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. J Food Eng. 78(1): 174–183. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.013

Amoah R., Abano E.E., and Anyidoho E.K. 2017. The effects of moisture content and loading orientation on some physical and mechanical properties of “tafo hybrid” and “amelonado” cocoa beans. J Food Process Eng. 40(1): e12348. 10.1111/jfpe.12348

Aremu A.K., Ojo-Ariyo A.M. and Oyefeso B.O. 2022. Physical characterisation of two varieties of bambara groundnut seeds. Adeleke Univ J Eng Technol. 5(1): 31–38.

Atteh B., Olukemi O. and Adelola O.B. 2021. The effects of moisture content variation on some engineering properties of almond seed (Terminalia catappa). Indonesian Food Sci Technol J. 4(2): 45–50.

Aviara N.A., Lawal A.A., Mshelia H.M. and Musa D. 2014. Effect of moisture content on some engineering properties of mahogany (Khaya senegalensis) seed and kernel. Res Agric Eng. 60(1): 30–36. 10.17221/10/2012-RAE

Aviara N.A., Onaji M.E. and Lawal A.A. 2015. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Detarium microcarpum seed. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 17(4): 311–326.

Bajpai A., Kumar Y., Singh H., Prabhakar P.K. and Meghwal M. 2019. Effect of moisture content on the engineering properties of jamun (Syzgium cuminii) seed. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13325. 10.1111/jfpe.13325

Balasubramanian D. 2001. Physical properties of raw cashew nut. J Agric Eng Res. 78: 291–297. 10.1006/jaer.2000.0603

Bhushan B. and Raigar R.K. 2020. Influence of moisture content on engineering properties of two varieties of rice bean. J Food Process Eng. 43(10): e13507. 10.1111/jfpe.13507

Bulan R., Ayu E.S. and Sitorus A. 2020. Effects of moisture content on some engineering properties of areca nut (Areca Catechu L.) fruit are relevant to the design of processing equipment. INMATEH. Agric Eng. 60(1): 61–70. 10.35633/inmateh-60-07

Esgici R., Pekitkan F.G., Güzel E. and Sessiz A. 2018. Friction coefficients for gundelia tournefortii seed on various surfaces. In: XIX World Congress of CIGR (Commission Internationale du Génie Rural) on Sustainable life for children, Vol. 22. p. 25.

Gharibzahedi S.M.T., Mousavi S.M., Moayedi A., Garavand A.T. and Alizadeh S.M. 2010. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 12(1).

Ghodki B.M. and Goswami T.K. 2016. Effect of moisture on physical and mechanical properties of cassia. Cogent Food Agric. 2(1): 1192975. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1192975

Gupta P.C. 2012. Biological and pharmacological properties of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Haritaki)—an overview. Int J Pharm Sci. 4(3): 62–68.

Herak D., Kabutey A., Divisova M. and Simanjuntak S. 2013. Mathematical model of mechanical behavior of Jatropha curcas L. seeds under compression loading. Biosyst Eng. 114(3): 279–288. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.12.007

Kaliniewicz Z.D., Tylek P., Markowski P., Anders A., Rawa T., Jóźwiak K. and Fura S.Ù. 2013. Correlations between the germination capacity and selected physical properties of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seeds. Baltic For. 19(2): 201–211.

Kumar J., Prabhakar P.K., Srivastav P.P. and Bhowmick P.K. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of Chironji (Buchanania Lanzan) nut. J Agric Eng. 53(2): 45–54.

Malik M.A. and Saini C.S. 2016. Engineering properties of sunflower seed: effect of dehulling and moisture content. Cogent Food Agric. Article: 1145783. 2(1): 2–30. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1145783

Mirzabe A.H., Hajiahmad A. and Asadollahzadeh A.H. 2021. Moisture-dependent engineering properties of arugula seed relevant in mechanical processing and bulk handling. J Food Process Eng. 44(6): e13704. 10.1111/jfpe.13704

Mohite A.M., Sharma N. and Mishra A. 2019. Influence of different moisture content on engineering properties of tamarind seeds. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 21(1): 220–224.

Mohsenin N.N. 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Vol. 1: Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. Gordon and Breach Science, New York, NY.

Murathan Z.T., Erbil N. and Arslan M. 2020. Tıbbi amaçli kullanilan terminalia chebula ve terminalia citrina Bitkilerinin Kurutulmuş Meyvelerinde Antiradikal, Antibakteriyel ve mutajenik aktivite analizleri. Adnan Menderes Üniv Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 17(2): 181–187. 10.25308/aduziraat.691867

Nyorere O. and Uguru H. 2018. Effect of loading rate and moisture content on the fracture resistance of beechwood (Gmelina Arborea) seed. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 22(10): 1609–1613. 10.4314/jasem.v22i10.14

Ola O.I., Amoniyan O.A. and Opaleye S.O. 2020. Evaluation and quality assessment of pancakes produced from wheat (Triticum aestivum) and germinated tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) composite flour. Eur J Nutr Food Safety, 12(5): 82–89. 10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i530230

Olaniyan AK. and Oje P.H. 2022. Post-harvest technology: some aspects of the mechanical properties of the shea nut. Biosyst. Eng. 81(4): 413–420. 10.1006/bioe.2002.0049

Pathak S.S., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2019. Mass modeling of Belleric Myrobalan and its physical characterization in relation to post-harvest processing and machine designing. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1290–1300. 10.1007/s13197-019-04162-1

Pathak S.S., Sonawane A., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2020. Effect of moisture and axes orientation on the mechanical properties of the Myrobalan fruits and its seed under compressive loading. J Inst Eng India A. 101(4): 679–688. 10.1007/s40030-020-00476-y

Putri R.E., Yahya A., Adam N.M. and Abd Azis S. 2015. Correlation of moisture content to selected mechanical properties of rice grain sample. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol. 5(5): 264–267. 10.18517/ijaseit.5.5.561

Rao M.A., Syed S.H. and Rizvi Datta A.K. 2005. Engineering Properties of Foods, Vol. 1, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–15.

Sangamithra A., Gabriela J.S., Prema R.S., Nandini K., Kannan K., Sasikala S. and Suganya P. 2016. Moisture-dependent physical properties of maize kernels. Int Food Res J. 23(1): 109.

Selvi K.Ç., Pınar Y. and Yeşiloğlu E. 2006. Some physical properties of linseed. Biosyst Eng. 95(4): 607–612. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.008

Selvi K.C., Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. and Sauk H. 2020. Engıneerıng propertıes of two hazelnuts varieties and its kernel relation to harvest and threshing. Ital J Food Sci. 32(3): 528-539.

Shafaei S.M. and Kamgar S. 2017. A comprehensive investigation on static and dynamic friction coefficients of wheat grain with the adoption of statistical analysis. J Adv Res. 8(4): 351–361. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.04.003

Shafaei S.M., Nourmohamadi-Moghadami A. and Kamgar S. 2016. Analytical study of friction coefficients of pomegranate seed as essential parameters in the design of post-harvest equipment. Inform Process Agric. 3(3): 133–145. 10.1016/j.inpa.2016.05.003

Sharifian F. and Derafshi M.H. 2008. Mechanical behavior of walnut under cracking conditions. J Appl Sci. 8(5): 886–890. 10.3923/jas.2008.886.890

Shashikumar C., Pradhan R.C. and Mishra S. 2018. Influence of moisture content and compression axis on physico-mechanical properties of Shorea robusta seeds. J Inst Eng India A. 99(2): 279–286. 10.1007/s40030-018-0274-y

Shelare S., Kumar R. and Khope P. 2021. Assessment of physical, frictional, and aerodynamic properties of charoli (buchanania lanzan spreng) nut as potentials for development of processing machines. Carpathian J Food Sci Technol. 13(2): 174–191.

Singh H. and Meghwal M. 2019. Physical and thermal properties of various ajwain (Trachyspermum Ammi L.) seed varieties as a function of moisture content. J Food Process Eng. 43(2): e13310. 10.1111/jfpe.13310

Su Y., Cui T, Xia G, Gao X., Li Y, Qiao M. and Xu Y. 2021. Effects of different moisture content and varieties on physico-mechanical properties of maize kernel and pedicel. J Food Process Eng. 44(9): e13778. 10.1111/jfpe.13778

Swain S. and Gupta J. 2013. Moisture-related mechanical properties of drum-roasted cashew nut under compression loading. J. Crop Weed. 9(1): 164–167.

Vashishth R., Semwal A.D., Pal Murugan M., Govind Raj T. and Sharma G.K. 2020. Engineering properties of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) varieties as a function of moisture content and structure of grain. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4): 1477–1485. 10.1007/s13197-019-04183-w

Visvanathan R., Palanisamy P.T, Gothandapani L. and Sreenarayanan V. V. 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. J Agric Eng Res. 63(1): 19–25. 10.1006/jaer.1996.0003

Yıldız T. and Yeşiloğlu Cevher E. 2022. Some mechanical properties of chestnut in relation to product processing and equipment design. Turkish J Agric Food Sci Technol. 10(8): 1565–1570. 10.24925/turjaf.v10i8.1565-1570.5332

Yurtlu Y.B. and Yeşiloglu E. 2011. Mechanical behavior and split resistance of chestnut under compressive loading. J Agric Sci. 17(4): 337–346. 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001185

Yurtlu Y.B., Yeşiloglu E. and Arslanoglu F. 2010. Physical properties of bay laurel seeds. Int. Agrophys. 24: 325–328.